Showing posts with label enthusiasm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label enthusiasm. Show all posts

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Why Nancy Pearl Matters

I'm not very good with numbers. Never have been, and at my age, I feel safe in saying, I am unlikely now ever to be. When dear A. got us new cellphones a few years ago, he programed the simplest four-digit security code allowed. I never remember it, but then again, I almost never use the cellphone, or remember to turn it on. What does it say about me that I still carry our home phone number with me, although I call that number every day? That I've never memorized my Social Security number? That the work-husband, my sweet J., often remembers my computer passwords better than I do -- there being numbers involved, you see -- and that there have been days when I would never have been able to punch back in from lunch, without his help? One of my earliest promotions was from head-busboy to being a "night auditor," or bookkeeper, at a big hotel. Imagine. I could probably still do ten-key if I had to, though with my left hand, which drove my trainer mad, and only if I still had all night to check, and recheck, and recheck my figures. Never found me napping on that job, I can tell you.

I'm bad with dates as well: appointments, anniversaries, birthdays, and can never remember people's ages either, even my own. (This actually becomes something of a social advantage, I've found, as we all get older.) Having a completely unrelated conversation the other night, it occurred to me that I actually started working full time in a bookstore in 1987. Unless I've muddled the numbers again -- and I asked dear A. to check this for me, just to be sure, -- this means that next year I will have been in the book business for a quarter of a century. Can that be right? It doesn't seem so, but I've been assured, it's true.

Well, in my twenty four years then working in bookstores, I can think of only one person I have ever met who is regularly approached by complete strangers who, without introduction or so much as a handshake offered, walk right up and say, "Are you Nancy Pearl? Tell me what to read."

That is the sort of thing booksellers and librarians, at least in the beginnings of their working lives, always rather hope will happen. We all of us, when we are young, like to think that we will be asked someday to tell someone else what they should be reading, doing, thinking, wearing, wishing. Heaven forbid. One of the gravest disappointments of adult life is not coming to realize how infrequently one's opinion will ever be required, or even just solicited by way of being polite, but rather, the knowledge that one hasn't nearly the stock of ready opinions one remembers accumulating, and carefully conserving for later use, when one first ventured out into the world, most often with a mind dressed, draped and festooned with little else. Fashion plays a part. Often the first to go, when we leave home at last for good, are most of the opinions we inherited; the ones handed down, carefully wrapped in old onion-skin, and lovingly kept for our use by the generations that made us. What seemed durable, even venerable at home, seldom will last the length of that first long trip into independence. See, how shabby, threadbare, worn away? See, how the darns and patches, all that careful stitching by patient old hands, betrays the unfashionable antiquity of these things, in this, the first strong light of our first real freedom? Most of these then are discarded, discreetly, or thoughtlessly, before one has actually arrived anywhere really new. (One never feels the need of them again, until the time comes to clothe the next generation, and the wish to protect and preserve what is most precious overwhelms even the most rational of parents. The task, it is realized only too late, might have been made easier, had there been somewhere still about those best remembered, and now seemingly irretrievable comforts common to the most innocent memories of childhood; faith, affection, security, surety, and unstinting love. The miracle of course is that while one can and perhaps even should shake off what ill-suits the times, one need never fear losing the knowledge that comes to all but the unlucky few who never know what it is to rest against a mother or a father's heart.) As for most of the accumulated trash one picks up along the climb, believe me, though the young never will, most of this gets left behind well before half the ground one means to cover has been crossed. By the time the grade has leveled off, and well before, one hopes, there is any end to the journey in sight, of most of one's opinions, even those most treasured and carried longest, one now has little use, and advise, on even so pleasant a topic as books, can seem too impossibly complicated to offer with anything but reluctance, born of sad experience. How on earth should I know what anyone else should read?

The genius of Nancy Pearl is that she never answers such a question with anything other than another question, and then another, and another. Socrates, you know, did something similar.

First as a librarian, then as a lecturer and teacher, a writer and reviewer, and now as a radio and television personality, as well as an active participant in new social media, Nancy Pearl has made a unique career of being asked her opinion of books and answering nearly every question with another, even as she recommends, suggests, summarizes, introduces, connects, categorizes, laments, loves, loudly and softly, books, old and new, in every genre, for every age, on every topic from baseball to birds, fiction and history, biography and geography, and all the while enthusiastically denying that she has read nearly enough to say much of anything at all, though wasn't it kind of you to ask?

Nancy is so much a part of our bookstore, people often assume that she works there. She doesn't. Worse luck us. She is however ubiquitous about the place, even when she isn't there, getting coffee, meeting friends, taping her interviews for television, stopping by on her way to do a radio broadcast, talking to strangers about books. Her own books, the grand series of Book Lust and it's sequels, keep her place for her while she teaches and travels and lectures across the country and around the world. Not as good as having her actually about the joint, but the key to the success of her reading guides, the explanation, I think, of their continuing popularity with both the public and the trade, is that her writing is an extension of her conversation. Her books are not just a record of her personal preferences and reading recommendations, and not just anthologies of brief book reviews, but a frankly quite cunning reproduction in print of what it is to talk with her, one to one. Reading Nancy Pearl, as thousands of people have now discovered for themselves, is an open invitation, or so at least it seems to most people.

I have never, in all the years now that I have known the woman, heard her tell anyone what they should read. I have heard her asking people what they are reading and what have they read, why they wish to read more on a subject, what they liked best about a book she has been remarkably deft at discovering they have in common, where they are going on vacation, what they might like best about the book they've already bought, what books they might reread... I have heard her interview writers, and I have heard her interviewed in turn, though the only thing that seems to come of that is more questions from her, more books, more suggestions of what might be more interesting than anything, at least according to her, that she might have to say about herself.

What I have never heard Nancy Pearl say is that anyone was wrong to read a book they liked, even if she didn't, or that any book was bad, just because she did not care for it. I have tried to trap her into doing this. She often comes by the desk where I work on the sales floor of the bookstore, and we gossip and flirt and, of course, talk a bit about books. Should I ever manage to get her near to saying that a book was less than good, she makes a face that may be taken to mean distaste for either the book, or being asked such a direct question. Hard to tell, even after all these years. Whatever else she is then, she does not have the makings, even now, of a proper, serious literary critic. This is not for want of qualifications, or simply for reasons of modesty. Because of what I've come to understand must have been the very conscious decision she would seem to have made well before I met her, her mission in life might best be described as listening to other people, something proper, serious literary critics seemingly can not wait to stop doing so as, finally, to be heard. I suspect she has no more liking for the sound of her own voice than she has confidence in the immortality of her prose. She's wrong to say such things about herself; her voice, I can attest, is pleasant, her prose equally charming, but I must admit that it is all the easier to disagree with her because she will say so little in her own defense. (Imagine such a character writing, on why criticism matters, for a special edition of The New York Times Book Review!)

"Censure is willingly indulged, because it always implies some superiority: men please themselves with imagining that they have made a deeper search, or wider survey than others, and detected faults and follies which escape vulgar observation." said Dr. Johnson, of the critics. While I will never be among their number, I blush to think how apt that description is of even some of the little things I write about books, and literary criticism, here. Nancy Pearl would seem to feel not the slightest desire to criticize when she might as easily recommend, and get more accomplished, in that way, to encourage literacy, promote reading, preserve literature and, well, show everybody a good time, without much worrying about what might "escape vulgar observation." The closest she comes to vulgarity herself is her inexplicable affection for Country music on her Ipod when she jogs. (The kind of intimate detail that I flatter myself will make my small contribution here to her mounting collection of recent accolades, uniquely valuable. I have knowledge of a few other similar eccentricities I might yet reveal, but I may save those for another day. Let her worry.)

Nancy is a democrat. Whatever her politics, her philosophy, both personal and professional, is perhaps best summed up in that one word. Like many a shy soul who has found herself living an unexpectedly public life, her every instinct, I feel, is to apologize and withdraw before she embarrasses herself any further. Appearances to the contrary, she is not an inherently cheerful or outgoing person. She hates to travel. She dislikes crowds. For someone who now earns her living at podiums and behind microphones, she remains surprisingly reluctant to make oraculations or speechify, or even speak above an intimate pitch. Yet intimacies from her are rare enough, on any subject other than her reading, even among friends -- on whom she would not think to impose a confidence without blushing -- as to surprise even those of us who might with pride claim some personal acquaintance. Her moods she confesses easily enough, but then these are nothing she can hide. Her prospects at poker would be slight, as I doubt she could bluff a child of seven at a game of Old Maid. That said, whatever she might be feeling, however dim her view of the day before her, she will make herself go out into it, if for no other reason than because her schedule allows her few other options. She is, frankly, too damned busy to be as blue as she might be, if she didn't have to fly to Cleveland in an hour. And however pessimistic she might be about accomplishing a third of what she has set herself to do, however reluctantly she must suffer the company of other human beings, I have never known anyone, stranger, acquaintance or friend, to find her less than the best company in the world. It isn't the books she reads, by the way, in their hundreds, each year, that provides her companionship, however brief, with its charm, it is her, Nancy herself; with all her self-critical gloom, her maddening modesty, and her often unsuspected unhappiness, she believes absolutely in the value of other people, not simply what they know, or what they may read or have read that she hasn't, but in the shared humanity that makes everyone if not interesting to her, as she isn't some saintly fool, then no less worthy than she of a kind word, a moment's attention, respect. Of all the friends I've made in the world of books, among booksellers, writers, librarians, customers and readers, I can honestly say, I've never met anyone who better represents the potential of books to bridge the gaps between us than the little "retired" librarian from Seattle, and my friend, Nancy Pearl.

Influence can be a dangerous thing, as events so recently in the news would seem only too sadly to confirm. Most who aspire to it may rightly be suspected of being unworthy to wield it. Books can be said to have a better influence, some of 'em, than even their most devoted readers, even their authors, may fully understand. E. M. Forster said, “I suggest that the only books that influence us are those for which we are ready, and which have gone a little farther down our particular path than we have yet gone ourselves.” To this I would only add that when we are lucky enough to meet along the way someone willing to offer any assistance she might in helping us to any book we might need, even without knowing it, we ought to recognize by now how rare a friend we've found in such a one. Nancy Pearl has made more friends than she knows, by doing just that. It is high time we thanked her.

Thanks, Miss Fancy. And thanks for the books. As the great Sonny James used to sing, "That's why I love you like I do."

Friday, January 23, 2009

Closing Out My First Day In a Mellow Tone


In a long phone conversation tonight with a dear friend, too seldom seen, we returned again and again to the subject of misunderstandings and the frequency with which we find ourselves misunderstood from that best of motives: enthusiasm. Now, my friend is a musician and an instrument maker, an artist and mask maker, a true bohemian and the gentlest soul I've ever met. The very idea that anyone new to his acquaintance would find in him anything uninteresting strikes me as astonishing. Few are the men I've ever met more likely to surprise, delight and reward with affectionate sympathy even the slightest interest. J. listens, as I've found musicians tend to do, with an even greater facility than he talks. As a talkative old party, what more could I require in a younger friend? That he is also very easy on the eyes only adds to his attraction of course, but we speak just now of higher things, and it is his enthusiasm; for music, for books, for sex, for life, that seems most often to put him into corners.

I'll explain, briefly. When asked what he was doing when I called, J. explained, without the least self-consciousness, that he was "just working on the script for the Job play." That this project is a puppet show, that it is, indeed meant to tell the story of the Biblical Job -- subject you will remember of that infamously heartless celestial bet -- and that, as with most of my friend's many artistic undertakings, this will involve "early music" and little or no pay, I understood immediately that we were off to unfamiliar places together. I know J. and his ways well. But not everyone would. How could one not want to know more? And yet, there are those benighted souls who on hearing just such a rare occasion for interesting conversation, will turn the talk immediately to the weather, the day's news, or the state of their child's diapers. My friend's enthusiasm, in much of his daily life, is met not with the curiosity he deserves and invokes from any sensible person, but instead with a coldly intentional misunderstanding. The assumption sometimes made -- from his facial tattoos, his quiet manner, the gamba strapped to his back -- is that there is simply... too much to address. And so a rare opportunity, a rare individual is missed.

Do not confuse eccentricity with interest. There are as many bores with feathers in their hair and studs in their eyebrows as there are in business suits and Florsheim shoes. But having ventured a chat with someone like J., however basely carnal one's initial interest -- the boy is hot, I tell you -- one will find, at least in him, fascinations far beyond the termination of the tattoo that may start at his navel. And yet friends, and even lovers, as well as strangers have refused the obvious invitation J. is to learn. And that is an awful thing, and breaks his heart I think, more often than one would assume one heart, however brave, could be broken.

In my own little life, lived far less expansively than J.'s, and fenced all around with timidity, hesitations and the avoidance of embarrassment, I too have had some experience of presuming too much on the interest of others. Though my stock of anecdote and event comes all but exclusively from the books that have always been better friends to me than I have been to them, my enthusiasm has too often been met with a not dissimilar indifference. When I've wanted so badly to communicate, for example how perfectly Addison may have addressed just the point being made, too often I've bumbled the quote, or even if I've got it right, I've dropped it too late into the mix and so spoiled rather than spiced the dish being served. My enthusiasm can be mistaken for pedantry, and my engagement for garrulity.

So my new venture online may serve only to prove yet another opportunity for misunderstanding. I never intend to bore, though I know I do. And if, in my enthusiasm for old books and old language, for long, breathless sentences and dependent clauses, for commas and chatter, I have already undone this new effort to engage with the world, I am sorry.

Perhaps I would do better to take yet another lesson from my friend, and let music make my way for me. I never finished my oboe lessons in Jr. High, and I can not sing, though I do, so I promise, when able to add a song to this typing, from a better source than myself. Perhaps, if it is allowed, I might share the Anita O'Day I'm listening to now. Do you know the great, late Anita O'Day? As jazz singers go, she is the rhythm of a snare drum and the snap of a bass, rather than the flight of trumpets. And I like my Anita old, in "recovery" and much the worse for wear. "Live in Concert Tokyo 1976" plays out all around me as I write tonight. "Sweet Georgia Brown" is pounding and skipping through brief thickets of polite Japanese applause and as always, Anita is swinging. I can't make such music myself, would that I could, so instead let me just humbly recommend for now something perfect that requires no explanation from me. This at least is an enthusiasm all too easy to share. Just find it and listen.

Meanwhile, goodnight to sweet J., whose music this isn't but who would listen attentively should I suggest or insist, and who, as I end for the day, I still wish were here, to tell me more about Job, and puppets, and harpsichords and Handel, and the boy that misunderstood and broke his heart again.