Showing posts with label Anthony Burgess. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anthony Burgess. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 3, 2019
Daily Dose
From A Clockwork Orange, by Anthony Burgess
HE WAS
"He was also very boastful and started to make a very sneery litso at us all and a loud proud goloss. He made out that he was the real horrorshow prestoopnick in the whole zoo, going on that he'd done this and done the other and killed ten rozzes with one crack of his rooker and all that cal. But nobody was very impressed, O my brothers."
From Chapter 2
Wednesday, August 31, 2016
Monday, December 13, 2010
Recommendations: 10 Good Books I Shouldn't Have Liked: Part Two
To kick off the second part of this post, I thought I'd just mention that not every book I'm recommending this Christmas season is something I didn't think I'd like. Despite what seems to be my now established reputation as a curmudgeon, most of the books I try to slip into customers' shopping baskets are titles I came to promote more directly. I have my enthusiasms, and not all of them are out of print. Honest. That said, here are five more that surprised me:
6) Dog Stories, selected and edited by Diana Secker Tesdell. I am not the dog person in the bookstore where I work. In fact, there are probably as many canine enthusiasts in the bookstore as there are cat-fanciers. Then there are people like my beloved work-wife, Ms. T., who are just plain animal fanatics. Ms. T. lives with dogs, cats, and lord knows what else, besides her dear husband, Michael. I know for a fact that if she could, she'd have timber wolves living under her porch. Ms. T. just has a whole lot o' love for the furry folks. I grew up with animals, most of them meant to be working animals: barn-cats, hunting dogs, orphaned ponies and horses rescued by my father, a raccoon, and of course the chickens and pigs that were meant for their usual fate, but most of these ended up being pets. The pigs did eventually get to the freezer and the smokehouse, but my sentimental father, though a country boy born and raised, had to hire Amish to do the butchering when the time came. He couldn't even be on the place while it happened.I liked having dogs and the rest around the homestead, until it was time to feed them, etc. I hated chores. I've never had a dog of my own, or any pet, since manumission from home. The husband and I don't have pets, or children. Instead, we have "nice things": books that don't smell like pee, unbroken crockery, bibelots, lazy Sunday mornings in bed, meals made just for two. I've always imagined, should I outlive my old man, I'd get me a bulldog; a nice affectionate, sedentary beast, with a healthy appetite, limited mobility and a proper appreciation for a warm, unmade bed, to remind me... (If I should predecease, I'm pretty sure he'd get a cat, with similar attributes; something fat, and orange, that preferred naps to wandering.)
Many of the dog people at the bookstore can not or will not read dog stories, for fear the dog might die. Me, I usually won't read them for fear the dog will talk like Garth Stein.
I am not then the perfect reader for animal stories. I've collected these handsome little short story anthologies from the Everyman's Pocket Classics series since they started with a wonderful collection of Christmas Stories. Still my favorite Holiday recommendation, at only fifteen bucks a book, these handsome volumes are a great gift. I've liked some volumes better than others, and the best to date have all been edited, as this latest one is, by Diana Secker Tesdell. She's got a gift for making anthologies, and that is rarer than one might think. I knew I'd buy the Dog Stories, to keep the series complete, and maybe even browse it, because of the great editor, but I didn't think I'd ever read the whole thing. Well, I have. It's marvelous. Thurber, Penelope Lively, Wodehouse, Lethem; there is something surprising with almost every story. I loved the Kipling story, "Garm," so much, and the whole book, I'm thinking we need to have a reading at the store, come February or thereabouts, and invite folks to bring their dogs.
7) I'm old enough to remember something of what is now just history, not so old though that I have anything like a detached view of certain scoundrels, villains and blowhards that I remember only too well. So I still haven't the faintest idea what made me pick this book up off the pile of advance-readers-copies one day and take it with me to lunch. Never thought I'd end up reading another book about this particular president after Greg Mitchell's excellent, and infuriating, Tricky Dick and the Pink Lady: Richard Nixon vs Helen Gahagan Douglas-Sexual Politics and the Red Scare, 1950. Time spent, even on the page, with our disgraced 37th, is time spent in very bad company indeed. Yet, once I'd started Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washington's Scandal Culture, by Mark Feldstein, I couldn't stop. It is the portrait of Anderson; now perhaps largely a forgotten name, but once the journalist most hated, and feared, by Richard Milhous Nixon, that I think pulled me in. I remember Anderson well on television as an acidulous, middle-aged windbag in a good blazer and a loud tie, when I was a youth. Just another talking-head to ruin Sunday morning television, I probably thought at the time. Turns out, he was also a great, Pulitzer Prize winning investigative reporter, who broke, among others stories, the one about the CIA trying to kill Castro with an exploding cigar, J. Edgar Hoover's friends in the Mafia, and the Reagan era criminal folly that came to be remembered as the rather mildly named "Iran-Contra affair." Feldstein's book does both the reporter, and the politician, full justice, but it is in Anderson that he has found a fascinating, flinty character with which to strike fresh sparks from the stone-dead Nixon. Their's was a mighty blaze up, and Feldstein's book rekindles what must have been a fascinating contest between two powerful, pompous, deadly rivals. By the time I'd read of Nixon's plot to get Anderson discredited in a fake homosexual scandal, I simply had to read on to the end.Then there is the author's acute analysis of just how this ugliness directly contributed to the pervading atmosphere in DC of mutual one-ups-manship that has defined, and undone, the relationship between the Presidency and the press ever since. Disheartening, but fascinating reading.
But then comes a new novel, called Nashville Chrome, by Rick Bass, and it defies my expectations of the writer, and of my usual interests, by being about something I would usually care to read about even less than chiggers, camping and stream-wading: namely, country music. Music is something that does not always play well in a novel, any kind of music. As a background, all kinds of music can work in all kinds of stories -- except rock & roll, which in my experience tends to be absolutely deadly in fiction -- but music and musicians at the center of a novel all too often can make even the best, most sophisticated novelist sound like a right fool at worst, or at best, a pedant. Anthony Burgess, a brilliant novelist, and no doubt a remarkable musical mind, could get his fictional invention and musical appreciation so tangled together, in a book like his near masterpiece, Napoleon Symphony, as to make much of what he'd put in the novel all but unreadable to a musical lightweight like me. What's more, in that book, even a novelist as dazzlingly entertaining as Burgess, when too rhapsodically musical, can be, frankly, boring. I could never quite get that book, or at least, I felt myself made to feel that I hadn't. Now Bass has written a novel by no means so sophisticated or complex as Burgess's book, any more than the music Bass is writing about is as glorious as Beethoven, but in a way, that was all to the advantage of Rick Bass.
I like more country music as I get older and further away from the sound of it endlessly playing through my childhood. It is, after all, at least in the classic period when Bass sets his book, primarily a music about adult -- which is honestly to say mostly middle-aged and male -- concerns like fidelity, faith, and hard knocks. In the story of siblings Maxine, Bonnie, and Jim Ed Brown, their rise to country music, and even pop stardom, and their inevitable fall when popular music left them behind, the novelist has found a well neigh perfect vehicle to ruminate on America's rather shallow emotional and musical culture, on the failures of family, and records that spoke to and for people like, well, my people.
This new novel by Bass, I would never have read, had it not been required of me, but I am damned glad I did. Made me listen to the Carter Family, and George Jones singing, "He Stopped Loving Her Today," and it made me homesick.
The idea then -- having ranted away again about this, in a Christmas list, no less --that I would then go on to recommend X'ed Out, by Charles Burns, might strike more than one reader as ridiculous. That's as may be. This guy is brilliant. If you've missed his earlier book, Black Hole, you've missed an amazing experience. This new book, the first of what's meant, as I understand it, to be a trilogy, is every bit as complex, disturbing and exhilarating as was that. I won't begin to try to describe the plot, for want of a better word, in Burns' book. Forget that. What this man makes are gloriously realized nightmares, and like our own nightmares, for all that is unpleasant or ugly in them, there can also be a truly strange and moving beauty. His drawing and coloring style are both heavily influenced by earlier comic book artists, and full of sly and accomplished references to their work. Burns is not, however just someone who works in pastiche. The list of his possible influences would, I should think, run the very long way from Beardsey to Burroughs, with plenty of input from the pulp artists, possibly as obscure as Steve Ditko. I don't know and I don't much care. If anything, this new title is even more interesting than his last.
While I could hardly recommend giving a book by Burns to one's grandmother, unless one had a very special grandmother indeed, I do think anyone already expressing an interest in science fiction, new comix or graphics in general, really needs to see this guy's work. It is extraordinary. What's more, I feel sure that when most of what is now being ballyhooed as important in this field looks quaint and is left to just the fanboys and collectors, Charles Burns will still be important. He's that good.
10) And finally, to round out my own top ten of unlikely favorites, I must put in a word, not that it will need it this Christmas, for Colonel Roosevelt, the concluding volume of Emund Morris' grand, three volume biography of TR. Morris, sadly, might still best be remembered by readers for his disastrous authorized biography of Ronald "Dutch" Reagan. That would be a damned shame. I can think of no other respected biographer and historian who dropped a bigger, noisier, or smellier stink bomb than that book. It wasn't just the invented voice of Reagan's imaginary friend, or the resulting scandal when this device was revealed, that made that such a terrible book. The biographer went, I think, a little mad, after the contracts were all signed, when he discovered after years of careful research that in Ronald Reagan, there was no there there. Lots of people could've told him that. They probably did. Maybe he thought there just had to be... something. Well, there wasn't, in the man or in the biography.But before Morris took up with that empty suit, he was already hard at work on a masterful biography of one of the most interesting men to ever occupy the White House, Theodore Roosevelt. In two previous volumes, Morris has already traced the rise and the presidency of this fascinating character. Now, in his concluding volume, he writes of the last great burst and tragic extinguishing of that remarkable mind. I read both of the earlier books straight through -- a rare thing with me -- because they were just so full of incident, charm and wit. If in reading this last volume, I remain unconvinced of Roosevelt's greatness, it is no fault of Edmund Morris. It would be easy enough to argue that for every grand thing that TR did or said or wrote, he did almost as much or more that rather dims the shine, at least for a reader like me. The magic of Morris' biography, even in this last book, is that while one might feel a hectoring distrust of the author's conclusions, and of the President's intentions and effect, while reading at least, it is all too easy to just love TR. What a grand character!
I have no Republican heros much after Lincoln, and TR will never be my kind of guy, but I do enjoy him, and this biography. I'm not finished with it yet, but I know I will, and that I shall miss the man when I'm done. That must have as much or more to do with the skill with which Morris has written him, as it may with the very charismatic man himself.
And so, there's an end to this. I still plan to make a proper list of my favorite books this year, books not offered with so much equivocation perhaps, or with the need to state my reservations, or describe quite so clearly the limits of my taste, but for now, this will have to do. So, read these books! Trust me, it will be well worth the doing.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Daily Dose
SHAKESPEAREAN SPECULATION
"I propose to indulge myself in an onomastic fancy that the hard-headed reader is welcome to ignore. (...) The whole of this paragraph is very unsound."
From Chapter 4, Marriage
Labels:
Anthony Burgess,
biography,
Daily Dose,
Quotations,
William Shakespeare
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Something for the Puter Leat
Talking with dear W. from the Wednesday book group, I was reminded that the reading of serious fiction is not always a part of the intellectual lives of even the brightest people I know. Poor W. is a student and spends her days studying fish and forestry and other such respectable, unfathomable things. She is a brilliant, warm and very funny woman who, along with her equally brilliant, warm and funny partner A., joined the club to have a regular evening out. (One presumably can only spend but so much time reading and reading about trees and fish, and studying Russian at one point as well, by the way, just to give you some idea of the kind of first rate minds I'm talking about here.) I am awfully grateful they decided to make the club their point of contact with community. Feels like I've known them for years. Between them, they make me laugh so regularly and hard I wonder we haven't giggled ourselves into asthmatic fits.
W. does not have the habit of literary novels, so the book club is something of a departure for her. It can't have been an easy thing, making the time for and investing in novels by the likes of Gore Vidal and Patricia Highsmith for a reader not much accustomed to such. What W. told me that she does read -- or did before she decided to take a course load that would tax the endurance of a bus load of Jeopardy nerds -- is dystopian Science Fiction. She was rather apologetic as she admitted this. What for? True, I'm a snob, but into every genre a masterpiece or two must fall, no?
I told W. as much. Much of what I think of as dystopian fiction is older than the SF genre, so the dystopian SF I remember tends to be from movies. (Where the future comes in only two outfits: the distressed leather ala "Mad Max" or unitards, hopefully filled with dreamy Michael York, as in "Logan's Run.")

Thinking about the best of same, at least as I remember it from the days when I still read SF, I remembered two. A Canticle for Leibowitz, by Walter M. Miller, Jr., otherwise unknown, at least to me, is a wonderfully caustic, comic firestorm of a book. After the usual nuclear devastation (published in 1961, this sort of thing was a matter of course,) society rebuilds along medieval lines, with an order of monks preserving not so much the best of the past, as those bits of it they can find in the dirt of the American southwest. These include the writings and relics of the blessed Saint Isaac Leibowitz. The flight of this reconstituted society ever forward toward the same sorry ends accelerates as the novel progresses and the effect is dizzyingly dazzling.

My other favorite I would likewise rate with the best books of the second half of the late century,Riddley Walker, by Russell Hoban. Again the world has blown itself to bits and now, centuries later, barbarism has held sway for some time, with religion and government again one and the same. Here the amazing power of the book, rather as is Anthony Burgess' A Clockwork Orange, is in the invented language -- a twisted, post-apocalyptic, yet liltingly Kentish version of English -- in which the book is narrated. Riddley is a bright and resourceful boy and his is a voice both hilarious and powerfully moving. The strange new English he uses is a truly remarkable invention, and the novel is a wonder.
I wonder if other, regular readers of dystopian fiction -- a category of person it would not have occurred to me existed until W. described herself so -- have no issue reading the end of the world, dark barbarism everywhere, civilization and other comforting abstractions blown, but, like W., might be squeamish of actual violence on a human scale? W. refuses to watch violent movies, for example, as these give her vivid and horrible nightmares. She likewise expressed an entirely sincere horror of the Cormac McCarthy she'd read other than The Road. So perhaps dystopia isn't quite the place she actually visits regularly. Perhaps, with her ebullience and brightness, she sails through these dark places, secure in the knowledge that so long as there are such as her partner and herself moving in the world, the actual chances that it will all end are fractionally less likely. I like to think so certainly. Now to see if I can convince her, should she ever again have the time to read more than one novel a month, to read my favorites. It's what friends do; take you with them through the fun-house.
W. does not have the habit of literary novels, so the book club is something of a departure for her. It can't have been an easy thing, making the time for and investing in novels by the likes of Gore Vidal and Patricia Highsmith for a reader not much accustomed to such. What W. told me that she does read -- or did before she decided to take a course load that would tax the endurance of a bus load of Jeopardy nerds -- is dystopian Science Fiction. She was rather apologetic as she admitted this. What for? True, I'm a snob, but into every genre a masterpiece or two must fall, no?
I told W. as much. Much of what I think of as dystopian fiction is older than the SF genre, so the dystopian SF I remember tends to be from movies. (Where the future comes in only two outfits: the distressed leather ala "Mad Max" or unitards, hopefully filled with dreamy Michael York, as in "Logan's Run.")

Thinking about the best of same, at least as I remember it from the days when I still read SF, I remembered two. A Canticle for Leibowitz, by Walter M. Miller, Jr., otherwise unknown, at least to me, is a wonderfully caustic, comic firestorm of a book. After the usual nuclear devastation (published in 1961, this sort of thing was a matter of course,) society rebuilds along medieval lines, with an order of monks preserving not so much the best of the past, as those bits of it they can find in the dirt of the American southwest. These include the writings and relics of the blessed Saint Isaac Leibowitz. The flight of this reconstituted society ever forward toward the same sorry ends accelerates as the novel progresses and the effect is dizzyingly dazzling.
My other favorite I would likewise rate with the best books of the second half of the late century,Riddley Walker, by Russell Hoban. Again the world has blown itself to bits and now, centuries later, barbarism has held sway for some time, with religion and government again one and the same. Here the amazing power of the book, rather as is Anthony Burgess' A Clockwork Orange, is in the invented language -- a twisted, post-apocalyptic, yet liltingly Kentish version of English -- in which the book is narrated. Riddley is a bright and resourceful boy and his is a voice both hilarious and powerfully moving. The strange new English he uses is a truly remarkable invention, and the novel is a wonder.
I wonder if other, regular readers of dystopian fiction -- a category of person it would not have occurred to me existed until W. described herself so -- have no issue reading the end of the world, dark barbarism everywhere, civilization and other comforting abstractions blown, but, like W., might be squeamish of actual violence on a human scale? W. refuses to watch violent movies, for example, as these give her vivid and horrible nightmares. She likewise expressed an entirely sincere horror of the Cormac McCarthy she'd read other than The Road. So perhaps dystopia isn't quite the place she actually visits regularly. Perhaps, with her ebullience and brightness, she sails through these dark places, secure in the knowledge that so long as there are such as her partner and herself moving in the world, the actual chances that it will all end are fractionally less likely. I like to think so certainly. Now to see if I can convince her, should she ever again have the time to read more than one novel a month, to read my favorites. It's what friends do; take you with them through the fun-house.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


